Otherwise use BTRFS. This is the most desired feature of Btrfs. 1 / Windows 95 OSR2 (OEM Service Release 2) and then later in Windows 98. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. All of these Linux. NTFS. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Page 2 of 2. Es un sistema de archivos actualizado y también fiable. If you have multiple disks — and therefore parity or redundancy from which corrupted data can theoretically be recovered — EXT4 has no way of knowing that, even less using it to your. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. ago. 4 HDD RAID performance per his request with Btrfs, EXT4, and XFS while using consumer HDDs and an AMD Ryzen APU setup that could work out for a NAS type low-power system for anyone else that may be interested. Si su aplicación falla con números de inodo grandes, monte el sistema de archivos XFS con la opción -o inode32 para imponer números de inodo inferiores a 232. NTFS OpenBenchmarking. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. ZFS, the Zettabyte file system, was developed as part of the Solaris operating system created by Sun Microsystems. . For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. Find a motherboard with enough drive ports or real sata controllers to run all the drives. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen. - Đảm bảo dữ liệu khi thực hiện backup. ext4 if I don't care about the install. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. EXT4 is better in the general case. As well as btrfs. 2. It is the default file system in RHEL 6, Debian 7, Ubuntu 18 and so on. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. Probably those edge cases are not visible on an external USB hard drive, could be visible with external SSDs on a USB3. OMV4 or OMV5. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. 0 hard drive when using EXT4 and XFS. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. These days the system is more refined with Dalto’s Btrfs Assistant. 对于一些文件系统如Ext4等，在硬盘格式化时就全部确定了，而对于XFS则是动态生成的，BtrfS则是更特别的动态实现。. Because ext4 can't beat btrfs when it comes to snapshot/delete. XFS was surely a slow-FS on metadata operations, but it has been fixed recently as well. Distribution of one file system to several devices. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Phoronix: Linux 4. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. This is fundamental in determining the file system’s capacity. Ext4 te permite crear un máximo de 232 archivos. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. Of all the niche file systems, one of the most interesting is Z File. my oldest one a OCZ Agility3 60GB is. First up was the SQLite embedded SQL database library test. . ZFSはBtrfsの機能に似ている。 Linux ＝ GPLライセンスZFS = CDDLライセンスなので、ライセンス的に矛盾し、GPLのLinuxにはリンクできない。 が、KQ Infotechが工夫して、LinuxでネイティブにZFSを利用出来るようにした。 The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). Here are the major feature of BTFS over ext4. XFSI've drank the kool-aid and I both run btrfs on root, /home, and for a 1 TB data drive. I've also ran some experiments on some older machines with slow IDE drives, once while installing a distro with ext4, and once with btrfs+zstd as root. Thanks. XFS back then was buggy and error-prone, to say the least. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. Ext4 is the fourth version of the Ext(Extended) File System for Linux and is probably the most well-known file system for Linux out there. But as some users found out, automatic snapshot (at the time it was first released) ate disk space on single user installations. Zu diesen gehören eine integrierte RAID-Funktionalität, ein inkludierter Volume Manager und die Unterstützung von Dateisystemen bis 16EiB. My leading candidates are Ext3/4, XFS, Btrfs, and ZFS (feel free to argue for another). Hi I have used BTRFS for the first time since March 2023 on my internal archives directory. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. The first way is mkfs. Stratis is no where near ready for version 1. I currently have a ds1819+, currently, i have 8 x 4tb (5400rpm) 32G of ram 2x2tb nvme cachethe system is super fragmented and super slow synology says that i need to backup everything and recreate the volume. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. It's fine otherwise, but if you ever think you might want to shrink your partition, use ext4 or btrfs instead. The check task is involves reading roughly 2000 small files in their entirety and performing some processor intensive tasks on them. As cotas XFS não são uma opção remountable. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. This correlates with the previous experiment and the hypothesis. As mentioned above, when picking between Btrfs vs. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. So I did two rounds: the. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. zfs not. This is useful, though far less complete than the block-by-block checksums of btrfs and ZFS. El sistema de archivos es mayor de 2 TiB con inodos de 512 bytes. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. 1 / Windows 95 OSR2 (OEM Service Release 2) and then later in Windows 98. Potential for data loss: While btrfs has features to protect against data loss, these features can be complex to configure and may not always work as intended, leading to the possibility of data loss. - No RAID. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?Generally, would go with btrfs. And you might just as well use EXT4. Although Btrfs still has a journal-like log tree, it is only used to speed-up fdatasync/fsync. With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and ZFS On Linux. The way you describe this workload, I think it is not very demanding. For pure data storage, however, the btrfs is the winner over the ext4, but time still will tell. Btrfs was developed specifically to facilitate quick administration and maintenance. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. An anonymous reader writes "Phoronix has published Linux filesystem benchmarks comparing XFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems. you don't have to think about what you're doing because it's what. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. When space gets low, Btrfs automatically expands the volume in chunks of roughly 1 GB. Complexity: btrfs is a more complex file system than ext4, and may require more advanced knowledge and expertise to manage and maintain. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. 29 release of the Linux kernel. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. It was time to do my quarterly disaster recovery drill, which involves bootstrapping my entire system from scratch using my scripts and backups. Does it means that Btrfs is better than Ext4 now ? btrfs has already long been an excellent and stable filesystem. This process have two main steps: 1. NT-based Windows did not have any support for FAT32 up to. The Btrfs filesystem supports read-only and writable snapshots of the file. 2. An efficient file system is necessary for everyday system processes. Here, you can use either command: dd, or truncate. Both btrfs and zfs feel like the worst options considering their overhead. It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. I have hard reset my machines running XFS and not once did I have any problems or need to give the partition the "spank of life" if you will. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. • 3 mo. 21 merge window (now known as Linux 5. Provides good performance for many enterprise work load, and probably some desktop ones too. The ext FilesystemsHere is a look at the Linux 5. Maybe adding Btrfs compression would be negligible outside of storage benchmarks. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. ext4 ファイルシステムは、2 32 個を超える inode をサポートしません。 XFS は inode を動的に割り当てます。It provides a basic Unix- like file system for Linux, using virtual directories to handle physical devices, and storing data in fixed-length blocks on the physical devices. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. 7. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of subvolumes is nice too, rather than having to partition). A. BTRFS系统性能最差，下面是去掉该系统其它3种的对比. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: 8. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. 6. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. 1. ext4 is not recommended. xx kernel days was an entirely different story, however. creating volumes and mounting them would need to check that option and decide on appropriate mount points. XFS vs. In a few words, I just need a really reliable and fast filesystem for years ahead, with the care of SSD in mind, I need it mostly for gaming, video-audio production, working with a lot of small/medium files (from 100-500Kb to 100-150Gb) sending them. It does its job well. Otherwise use BTRFS. Abstract and Figures. The supported size of the filesystem may vary depend on Linux distribution versions. Btrfs vs ext4 . Difference between Ext4 vs Btrfs filesystems on Linux. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. Linux 5. User quotas for each shared folder. NVMe drives formatted to 4096k. The ext file-system uses a system called inodes to track information about the files stored in the virtual directory. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. No swap because 16GB RAM is enough for me. For close to ZFS feature parity but much younger, BTRFS. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. 2. F2FS vs. But… Some different plus for BTRFS Backup is about data safety. Complementing the benchmarks from yesterday are some more results today with Bcachefs compared to EXT4, Btrfs, XFS, and F2FS with testing being done from the same Intel M. Especially things that cause lots of file-internal fragementation like databases. g. Perhaps btrfs is much better for SSDs, but in oldschool HDDs I. While I have used btrfs balanced, timeshift and my other develop tool scripts for managing borg backups rely a lot on standard linux file. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Though EXT4 has few strong capabilities, it is reliable and well-maintained across all Linux operating systems. , a really large number of processes all writing to the filesystem at once). There won't be any noticeable difference. 8 snapshot as of last week. 但无论如何，各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息，因为这是内核规定的（见下）。. Improve this answer. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. There are several filesystems such as ext4, f2fs, btrfs. F2FS vs. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. - Bảo vệ dữ liệu. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. On that list, only xfs is older. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. Ext4 for Synology NAS devices, most users should pick Btrfs for the data integrity benefits that it provides. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. One of the biggest differences between them is that their supported operating system. The first command looks like this: dd if=/dev/zero of=file-sparse bs=1 count=0 seek=2G. 8 snapshot as of last week. As far as I know, the 4k block size is important for such webgui, it makes it faster to open sites (for ex. ^ Microsoft first introduced FAT32 in MS-DOS 7. BTW, transparent compression can offset much of the performance penalty between using a fs like btrfs or ZFS and a more traditional fs like ext4 or xfs, depending on your workload. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4,Sure, BtrFS has its benefits and novel features, but "has never once failed me in 10+ years" is an incredibly strong reliability trend that I'd be hesitant to trade for those, especially in a piece of my infrastructure where a single failure could potentially cause massive loss of data and subsequent time spent recovering from backups/etc. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. Delay allocation. That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. Hey guys, I’m also in this quest of finding out the best configs for the temp drives. BTRFS hatte auch etwas höhere Latenz als EXT4, was bedeutet, dass es länger dauerte, bis Dateien auf dem Dateisystem zugegriffen werden konnten. Ext4中没有这种内置的压缩支持。 Btrfs直接从磁盘删除重复数据，而Ext4不能这样做， Btrfs支持. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. So với Ext4, Btrfs hoạt động ổn đinh hơn, dễ dàng quản lý hơn và tích hợp nhiều ứng dụng hỗ trợ tốt cho doanh nghiệp Quy mô lớn. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. NTFS and FAT are known in Windows environments. Another point against btrfs is the insane amount of memory it uses. When use btrfs it's 35-40 MB/s. mount the recently formatted btrfs partition without special options just with mount /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt and create the subvolumes you want, e. #11. I'd stick with safer file systems like XFS, JFS, EXT4, or imported ZFSOnLinux. Linux 5. I think the consensus these days is it’s good for single drive and raid 1. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen Dateien als EXT4. Depends on what you're looking for. BTRFS is newer, and the performance is not as good in many cases, but it is not far off. BtrFS RAID 6 implementation is "mostly working", see here:As some of you likely know, I have a favorable view of ZFS and especially of MySQL on ZFS. Actually, Btrfs might have the upper hand there even, if zstd filesystem compression is used. Running this fio command, I get about 2. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. だが、Linux 5. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. Indie games often too get fair amount of gain. In the case of the Intel 900p SSD, the XFS results were too fast to accurately measure while EXT4 and F2FS took just two seconds to complete while Btrfs took six seconds. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. Some feel that it is not mature enough for production use while there are also early adopters of this. Precisely, it seems to be 50%. For a single disk, both are good options. 1 interface. Under Compile Bench, EXT4 was the fastest on all three drives followed by a mix of XFS and F2FS. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. #filesystem #ext4 #xfs #linuxExplicación de las diferencias entre sistemas de archivos, en este vídeo se comparan los 2 mas usados en GNU/Linux. For a while, MySQL (not Maria DB) had performance issues on XFS with default settings, but even that is a thing of the past. ago. 356 Btrfs—short for "B-Tree File System" and frequently pronounced "butter" or "butter eff ess"—is the most advanced filesystem present in the mainline Linux kernel. . Some feel that it is not mature enough for production use while there are also early adopters of this potential successor to ext4. Comparison of file archivers. I have 6 disks so I have created 3 logical disks, 2 SSDs each - just for testing. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. freebird54 September 21, 2021, 2:58pm 10. Btrfs also has snapshots so you can revert back to an earlier snapshot easily, say you run arch and some update borks your system (highly unlikely), you can simply revert back to the last good snapshot. Example: Dropbox is hard-coded to use ext4, so will refuse to work on ZFS and BTRFS. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Just so perfect to roll back for some games and modding. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. Files less than ~2KiB can be stored in the metadata section (“inline” in the b-tree nodes), so as not to waste most of a block. But, as always, your specific use case affects this greatly, and there are corner cases where any of. The XFS File System. After conversion I: enabled compression. 2. 6：顺序. Both timeshift and borg write to it. 3. And xfs. Ext4 is fast and rock solid, and easily recovered on a desktop machine if things go really bad. oneiric: 996. If you don't need consistency supported by a filesystem, you can use ext4 with journal option off, F2FS (when a program that use /tmp. 1 Like. ZFS (defaults): natty: 171. これらのファイルシステムはEXT4、Btrfs、ZFSであり、XNUMXつのファイルシステムは異なる特性を持ち、いくつかは異なるシナリオでより優れたパフォーマンスを発揮します。 外部4. 10 4. While it is possible to migrate from ext4 to XFS, it. With the noatime option, the access timestamps on the filesystem are not updated. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. For example, xfs cannot shrink. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. XFS vs. Otherwise btrfs for snapshots via snapper. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. ZFS is great but heavy/complex, and lack of block pointer rewrite can be painful. Like I said, you could do ZFS, but definitely feels a bit like overkill. El ext4 y xf. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. This is a significant difference: The Ext4 file system supports journaling, while Btrfs has a copy-on-write (CoW) feature. ext3 is the most common format. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. I have fsck enabled via fstab and it checked the fs at boot (Last checked: Thu Nov 4 07:58:57 2021) which maybe took 5 - 10 minutes, did not stop exact time though. Data integrity protection. In Summary, ZFS, by contrast with EXT4, offers nearly unlimited capacity for data and metadata storage. But still iffy on high raid levels. These included Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem (EXT4). xfs/. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. The answer is zfs. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. 10. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. Comparison of archive formats. btrfs sub cr /mnt/@ (the @ alone is the convention for "root directory" in btrfs) btrfs sub cr /mnt/@home. For BTRFS, the overall throughput is fairly low (~30k tps), while the jitter is somewhat better and worse than for EXT4/XFS at the same time. ago. Puedes crear hasta 264 archivos en un sistema Btrfs. With 4K random reads by FIO, the SATA/USB performance was flat across the. It was also during a power outage, and yes I should have had that. Hello everyone, I can't choose proper filesystem between XFS, ZFS (OpenZFS), BTRFS, F2FS and EXT4. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. Ext4. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. F2FS vs. (2013) compared the performance of Btrfs against XFS and ext4. Você deve ativar as cotas na montagem inicial. Btrfs uses Copy-on-Write (COW), a resource management technique where a. You can sometimes run into bugs and issues if your home directory is partitioned in XFS, BTRFS, or ZFS. And ext3. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. ”. Da Btrfs sehr leistungshungriger ist, benötigen NAS-Systeme dafür einen starken Prozessor und ausreichend Arbeitsspeicher. BTRFS and ZFS are metadata vs. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. XFS ファイルシステムのサイズのみを増やすことができます。ext4 は、ファイルシステムの拡張と縮小の両方をサポートします。 Inode 番号. 7. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other?XFS vs Btrfs. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. ago. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. XFS. 356 Btrfs—short for "B-Tree File System" and frequently pronounced "butter" or "butter eff ess"—is the most advanced filesystem present in the mainline Linux kernel. The fastest for the SATA/USB tests was XFS followed quickly by EXT4 and then F2FS. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. Linux 5. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 BTRFS is the latest file system we present, and began development in 2007 by Oracle Corporation as a replacement for EXT4. Downside is that it's a slower file system due to it's nature of redundancy. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. In summary, both Btrfs and Ext4 are good options for your NAS, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on your specific needs and use case. Btrfs is one of the most popular newly created file systems, and was. It provides an unlimited subdirectory. Ext4 fs can read and write to Ext2 or Ext3 file systems, but the Ext4 it is not compatible with Ext2 and Ext3 drivers. - Bảo vệ dữ liệu. Linux EXT4/Btrfs RAID With Twenty SSDs Storage :. 3. Tbh, it depends on game by game basis Team Fortress 2 will go as low as nearly 50%, same for KSP. EXT4 vs. I switched from ext4 to btrfs a couple of years ago. - Nén dữ liệu ở mức độ cao. In this test, Btrfs outperformed LVM in every benchmark. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. F2FS vs. 8ではPhoronixのテストの結果ではXFSが非常に速く、Ext4が遅い。 Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. Furthermore, the Ext4 is designed to be backward compatible. This file system enables drive pooling, automatic snapshot, transparent compression, and online defragmentation. , not available on the GUI for now) that allows choosing a file system from a white list, defaulting to ext4. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. Through many years of development, it is one of the most stable file systems. EXT4 is the successor of EXT3, the most used Linux file system. 3 Likes. It's got good features. EXT4 Vs XFS. Reasons why I avoided btrfs:Increased Performance of ext4 vs. The Backend/Frontend separation is clean and shardmap is clever. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers.